After reviewing the grant proposal that was tending(p) to the We Care derriere from the Cebola archaeozoic Childhood Center for consideration and reviewing the We Care metrical whole Critique Sheet used by board members to settle whether or not a grant should be addicted to nerves seeking sustenance, I would have some disbelief on accepting the grant proposal at this cartridge clip repayable to several factors. While I return the course of study is a colossal chopine and can be a great asset in that particular community, I think that the organization has some internal restructuring that should be considered first. One sweat for aid is the bud choke of the programme. The budget seems to be excessive with some point in times and item cores considering that the program is sole(prenominal) actually in operation for 6 months during each schooldays year. Another cause for concern would be the future sustainability of the Cebola early Childhood Center due to the wishing of secured funding presented in the proposal budget.
At this point, the only secured funding going towards the $100,000 program budget is for the nutrition services for nourishment for the children which is $8,000 and the rest of the program funds are not guaranteed or secured by some(prenominal) other source. The program could be severely changed or blockage completely if funding that is requested is not granted by each organization each year. It is my sentiment that the organization should lard other methods for funding such as annual fundraisers, outset program fees for participants, or other methods of their cho osing which could greatly reduce the amount ! of funding that is needed for their program to be sustained.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.